| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
23
   |
Posted - 2011.09.13 03:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Null sec would have less problems if it wasn't in the news all the time. It is because their voices are already too loud that the number of new subscribers is dwindling
If we are keeping people like you out of Eve then there is literally no downside.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 21:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:CCP Zymurgist wrote:Thread cleaned. Please try to post in a constructive matter. Thank you.
What are you thanking him for? It's still a bad thread.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 00:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Considering the source of your comment and the topic ... I am going to disregard it. 
Ah so you're just here to rant and not actually discuss anything. That might be why nobody is taking you seriously.
But keep tilting at windmills...and never stop posting. |
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
363
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 20:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:This thread should have died a long time ago.
Why you feel the need to bump your terrible thread and sight recent developments as evidence is beyond me.
Some people can't see beyond their hatred of Goons.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
403
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 01:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Quote:Eurogamer: The Council of Stellar Management [CSM] has been increasingly vocal and rebellious in recent months. What's your relationship with them like at the moment - your personal feelings and those of the company as a whole?
Hilmar P+¬tursson: The CSM has been under constant evolution based on what's going on in the current environment, what's going on with CCP and Eve, who's on the Council and all that. The CSM has helped greatly through the years in getting feedback for aspects of the game.
But some of my concerns right now relate to whether the CSM is maybe focused on a particular aspect of the game and I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle. That might mean we may need to change the structure, but definitely the CSM has worked as a feedback tool greatly throughout the years. We will have them over at the end of the year, after everything that's gone on, and we will have a chance to talk about that. We'll just see where we are and take it from there. You were saying? Link
You might want to back up and bold the first part of the sentence instead of cherry picking the part that makes it sound like he's agreeing with you.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
439
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 16:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Mittens gets his groupies ... they turn out not to be quite what he hoped for ...
Would you want a bunch of fat neckbeards as your groupies?
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
439
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:High sec is made up of many small groups that don't all know or like each other.
If you had candidates standing for each region then it would be those with the most votes who would get in and then have equal representation. As it is, null sec just commands voting chunks that are far disproportional to anything any of the other space regions can produce.
So we'll get one of our highsec alts to run as the highsec rep. Will that solve everything you're crying about?
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
448
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 18:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:You are also forgetting that Himlar himself complained about the CSM's null sec bias
No he didn't. The actual quote was about him hearing from some players that they were concerned about the CSM having a null sec bias. He didn't say he agreed with them.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
456
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 20:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Skunk Gracklaw wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:You are also forgetting that Himlar himself complained about the CSM's null sec bias No he didn't. The actual quote was about him hearing from some players that they were concerned about the CSM having a null sec bias. He didn't say he agreed with them. You are right. He said "we will keep them until the end of the year" suggesting.... take a guess  So he put some stock in the opinion of the people who were saying so, or it would not have been worth mentioning. I am on a roll here \0/ 0// \\0 WEEEEE!!!
You keep believing that. When reality hits you it will be even more fun for me.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
463
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 22:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:@Skunk Gracklaw
I like the part where you didn't not infer anything from "keep until the end of the year" after they fired 20% of their real-life labor force.
If CCP ends the CSM project that's fine. We pretty much accomplished what we wanted with CSM6. If they keep the CSM as is we'll keep voting for Mittens. If they try and create some dumb system of breaking the game into factions and having each faction vote a representative in we'll laugh about it and then sit and watch as it fails to get anything done. There is literally no way we lose.
We were content to pretty much ignore the CSM until some evil people got the idea of using it to make nullsec even worse than it already is so Mittens stepped up and prevented that from happening. CCP has a plan for nullsec and while I don't know all the details our people on the CSM sound positive about it so that's good enough for me (and I think a lot of other goons).
The problem you and the rest of the pubbie hordes are having with the CSM is that you don't really understand how it works. The CSM, on its own, has no power to make changes in Eve. It's purpose is to act as a sounding board for the developers and as a conduit for players to give their input. Every other CSM failed to understand this and, therefore, had little impact and we saw CSM members posting open letters, leaking NDA'd information, and quitting the CSM in protest. None of that had any effect on CCP or the game. CSM6 is different because it took the purpose of the CSM and used it as a platform to publicize problems within the game. The Mittani is a well-known Eve personality, has a column on a gaming-related website and most importantly is able to write in complete sentences and not sound like a mouth breather so when he decided to publicize the problems with the game the rest of the gaming media listened. You'll never admit it but Mittens is the best player advocate you have and all of you calling for him to be kicked off the CSM because he likes to blow up miners or you just hate goons in general are idiots. |
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
469
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 01:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I am going to chose not to respond at this time in order to encourage input from people we haven't heard from yet. 
"I've run out of ways to rephrase my lame arguments so I'm going to wait for somebody to do it for me."
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
476
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 04:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Skunk Gracklaw wrote:
"I've run out of ways to rephrase my lame arguments so I'm going to wait for somebody to do it for me."
 That desperate for my attention? Really?
Well you're the one that responded to the thread by saying you weren't going to respond to the thread so you tell me who needs attention.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
476
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 04:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
Desudes wrote:Seriously, wheres the on-ramp to null? Seeing people try to join the goons and get scammed out of 500mil is funny, but unproductive.
I didn't realize we were the only alliance in nullsec.
|
Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
491
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 17:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:(Btw: Anyone seen a reason from a GM or Dev why they are shoving all the CMS threads in here?)
Because they know they will receive fewer views in this forum. They are trying to discourage all the badposting.
|
| |
|